Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:47:14 -0600

Daniel,

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary".  If so, then by
> definition there are none.

Well, being GPL compatible is not a requirement for an open source license.

IANAL, but last I checked, pure-BSD is not compatible with GPL (it actually
has to be dual-licensed BSD/GPL).