From: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public•gmane.org>
To: linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public•gmane.org
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public•gmane.org,
bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public•gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ssb: Add support for new ChipCommon
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:31:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200608261331.00527.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608261233.32336.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Oops, sorry. Please drop this.
This patch is wrong and I will submit a correct one, soon.
a 0x900 core does not exist. Instead the meaning of the
revision bits changed slightly.
On Saturday 26 August 2006 12:33, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Please apply this to wireless-dev.
>
> --
>
> This adds support for the new 0x900 ChipCommon core.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public•gmane.org>
>
> Index: wireless-dev/drivers/misc/ssb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-dev.orig/drivers/misc/ssb.c 2006-08-24 22:33:44.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-dev/drivers/misc/ssb.c 2006-08-26 12:28:31.000000000 +0200
> @@ -648,7 +648,7 @@
>
> ssb->chipcommon_capabilities = 0;
> ssb->nr_cores = 0;
> - if (cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON) {
> + if (cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON || cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2) {
> tmp = ssb_read32(ssb, SSB_CHIPCOMMON_CHIPID);
>
> ssb->chip_id = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_IDMASK);
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_REVSHIFT;
> ssb->chip_package = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_PACKMASK) >>
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_PACKSHIFT;
> - if (rev >= 4) {
> + if (rev >= 4 || cc == SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2) {
> ssb->nr_cores = (tmp & SSB_CHIPCOMMON_NRCORESMASK) >>
> SSB_CHIPCOMMON_NRCORESSHIFT;
> }
> Index: wireless-dev/include/linux/ssb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- wireless-dev.orig/include/linux/ssb.h 2006-08-24 22:28:03.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-dev/include/linux/ssb.h 2006-08-26 12:26:11.000000000 +0200
> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@
> #define SSB_CC_MINI_MACPHY 0x823
> #define SSB_CC_ARM_1176 0x824
> #define SSB_CC_ARM_7TDMI 0x825
> +#define SSB_CC_CHIPCOMMON2 0x900
>
>
> /* ChipCommon core registers. */
>
>
--
Greetings Michael.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-26 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-26 10:33 [PATCH] ssb: Add support for new ChipCommon Michael Buesch
[not found] ` <200608261233.32336.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2006-08-26 11:31 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200608261331.00527.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb-fseuscv1ubazqb+pc5nmwq@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
--cc=linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public$(echo .)gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox