Subject: [PATCH 01/13] NetLabel: use gfp_t instead of int where it makes sense

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:38:43 -0500

From: Paul Moore <[email-masked]>

There were a few places in the NetLabel code where the int type was being used
instead of the gfp_t type, this patch corrects this mistake.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email-masked]>
---
 include/net/netlabel.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: net-2.6.20_netlabel-base-work/include/net/netlabel.h
===================================================================
--- net-2.6.20_netlabel-base-work.orig/include/net/netlabel.h
+++ net-2.6.20_netlabel-base-work/include/net/netlabel.h
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static inline void netlbl_secattr_destro
  * pointer on success, or NULL on failure.
  *
  */
-static inline struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *netlbl_secattr_alloc(int flags)
+static inline struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *netlbl_secattr_alloc(gfp_t flags)
 {
 	return kzalloc(sizeof(struct netlbl_lsm_secattr), flags);
 }

--
paul moore
linux security @ hp