public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug•ch>
To: jamal <hadi@cyberus•ca>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:40:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061201144058.GG8693@postel.suug.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1164983427.3562.36.camel@localhost>

* jamal <hadi@cyberus•ca> 2006-12-01 09:30
> Shall i assume that the patch showed up fine i.e no crap like mime?
> I still didnt get an echo back, did it make the list?
> 
> On Fri, 2006-01-12 at 13:49 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> 
> > I can't see why this should be required. genl_register_ops()
> > enforces a unique command id 
> > and genl_ops->cmd is u8 so there is no way to register more than 
> > 256 commands anyway.
> 
> By mistake during the tutorial, i had the id at something like 321.
> It registered fine but then listing the command showed it with a
> different id than what i thought it should be. I think it chops off
> all the bystes other than the LS one - which is not a good error
> check.
> The compiler will whine actually. If you ignore it (perhaps not seeing
> the warning in a mass compile) it registers just fine.

There is no way to fix this in the interface. If you do u8 op = 312
and ignore the compiler warning which states that the value has been
truncated it can't be helped, the interface will see op = 56 and
register it normally. It is logically impossible to have more than 256
entries on the cmd list, the boundry check you're adding is completely
useless.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-01 11:30 [G[PATCH 1/2][ENETLINK] max cmd boundary chec jamal
2006-12-01 12:49 ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-01 14:30   ` jamal
2006-12-01 14:40     ` Thomas Graf [this message]
2006-12-01 14:52       ` jamal
2006-12-01 15:16         ` Thomas Graf
2006-12-01 15:54           ` jamal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061201144058.GG8693@postel.suug.ch \
    --to=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus$(echo .)ca \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox