Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: Network virtualization/isolation

From: Tomasz Torcz <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 12:27:34 +0100

On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 04:50:02AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:57:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Herbert Poetzl <[email-masked]> writes:
> > 
> > >> But, ok, it is not the real point to argue so much imho 
> > >> and waste our time instead of doing things.
> 
> > > well, IMHO better talk (and think) first, then implement
> > > something ... not the other way round, and then start
> > > fixing up the mess ...
> > 
> > Well we need a bit of both.
> 
> hmm, are 'we' in a hurry here?
> 
> until recently, 'Linux' (mainline) didn't even want
> to hear about OS Level virtualization, now there
> is a rush to quickly get 'something' in, not knowing
> or caring if it is usable at all?

  Maybe beacuse other Operating Systems have it? For example Solaris'
Crossbow...

-- 
Tomasz Torcz               RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile.
[email-masked]     Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev