public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2•pl>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@redhat•com>
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@us•ibm.com>,
	greearb@candelatech•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!  (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:04:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070104110435.GA3175@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070104102707.GA7662@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:27:07PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:50:14AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > 
> > Could you explain? I can see some inet_rtm_newaddr
> > interrupted. For me it could be e.g.:
> > 
> > after
> > vconfig add eth0 9
> > 
> > ip addr add dev eth0.9 ...
> 
> Whether eth0.9 is up or not does not affect this at all.  The spin
> locks are initialised (and used) when the first IPv4 address is added,
> not when the device comes up.

I understand this. I consider IFF_UP as a sign all 
initialisations (open functions including) are
completed and there is permission for working (so
logically, if I would do eth0.9 down all traffic
should be stopped, what probably isn't true now).

Jarek P. 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-04 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-20  2:13 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2006-12-22  7:13 ` [PATCH] igmp: spin_lock_bh in timer (Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!) Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22  7:42   ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 13:47     ` Ben Greear
2006-12-22 14:05     ` Ben Greear
2006-12-27  8:24       ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-27 16:16         ` Ben Greear
2006-12-28 12:56           ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-29 11:16           ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22  9:48   ` Jarek Poplawski
2006-12-22 11:16   ` Herbert Xu
2006-12-22 12:53     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  5:00 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-02  7:39   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  8:23     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02  9:23       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-02 23:35   ` David Stevens
2007-01-02 23:43     ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03  8:07     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03  8:28       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-03 16:53         ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 22:14   ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:13     ` David Stevens
2007-01-03 23:35       ` Ben Greear
2007-01-03 23:56         ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  0:30       ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  1:02         ` Ben Greear
2007-01-04  1:14           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  5:41           ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  5:34         ` David Stevens
2007-01-04  6:26           ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  8:03             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04  8:29               ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04  8:50                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 10:27                   ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-04 11:04                     ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-01-04 17:04                       ` Ben Greear
2007-01-05 13:55                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-04 20:33             ` David Miller
2007-01-05  6:38               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05  9:38                 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:19                   ` [PATCH] devinet: inetdev_init out label moved after RCU assignment Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-05 11:23                     ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-05 11:37                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-09 22:38                       ` David Miller
2007-01-05 19:52                     ` David Stevens
2007-01-05 20:33               ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks) Ben Greear
2007-01-05 20:34                 ` David Miller
2007-01-08  6:53                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-08 16:57                   ` Ben Greear
2007-01-08 18:03                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-09  8:10                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10  9:04                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 12:50                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-10 20:01                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-11  7:24                               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  7:40                                 ` David Miller
2007-01-11  8:29                                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  8:35                                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  8:39                                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11  9:27                                         ` David Miller
2007-01-11 11:09                                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-01-11 17:42                                             ` RCU info Stephen Hemminger
2007-01-12 12:19                                               ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070104110435.GA3175@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2$(echo .)pl \
    --cc=dlstevens@us$(echo .)ibm.com \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech$(echo .)com \
    --cc=herbert.xu@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox