Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] Implement local diversion of IPv4 skbs

From: KOVACS Krisztian <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:05:05 +0100

Hi,

On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:32, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> How exactly are dynamic ports handled? Do you just add a catch-all rule
> that filters based on socket lookups?
>
> In that case you could do something like this:
>
> ip route add local default dev lo scope host table 1
> ip rule add fwmark 0x1 lookup 1
>
> and still use the socket lookups for marking, which would (without the
> socket caching) remove the need for this patch entirely.

  Ok, I'll try to address all the concerns raised on the list.

  Thanks a lot for the review and comments.

-- 
 Regards,
  Krisztian Kovacs