Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 04/10] net-sysfs.c changes.

From: Stephen Hemminger <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:22:03 +0100

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:21:51 +0200
Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> > Patrick McHardy <[email-masked]> wrote on 07/20/2007 03:37:20 PM:
> >
> >
> >   
> >> rtnetlink support seems more important than sysfs to me.
> >>     
> >
> > Thanks, I will add that as a patch. The reason to add to sysfs is that
> > it is easier to change for a user (and similar to tx_queue_len).
> >   
> 

But since batching is so similar to TSO, i really should be part of the
flags and controlled by ethtool like other offload flags.