Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

From: Al Viro <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:17:58 +0100

On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 02:02:10PM +0100, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> Quoting Al Viro:
> |  On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 01:32:43PM +0100, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> |  > [TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement
> |  > 
> |  > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[email-masked]>
> |  > ---
> |  > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> |  > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> |  > @@ -3129,6 +3129,7 @@ static void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk)
> |  >  			return;
> |  >  		default:
> |  >  			sk->sk_err = ECONNRESET;
> |  > +			break;
> |  >  	}
> |  
> |  Huh?  Why on the Earth would that be a problem?
> |  
> |  
> Sorry what is your question?

Why the hell is $Subject a problem that warrants any patches whatsoever?