public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb•de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik•org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core: split dev_ifsioc() according to locking
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 02:17:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710070217.09073.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071006204212.GA32177@havoc.gtf.org>

On Saturday 06 October 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> This always bugged me:  dev_ioctl() called dev_ifsioc() either inside
> read_lock(dev_base_lock) or rtnl_lock(), depending on the ioctl being
> executed.
> 
> This change moves the ioctls executed inside dev_base_lock to a new
> function, dev_ifsioc_locked().  Now the locking context is completely
> clear to the reader.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat•com>

Great idea!

I've been experimenting with a new compat_dev_ioctl() function along
the lines of what I just posted for the blkdev ioctls. For that, it
would be perfect to streamline dev_ioctl further:

* move the dev_load() and locking into dev_ifsioc{,_locked}
* move the copy_to_user step to a single place at the end of dev_ioctl

After that, we could have very simple dev_ioctl and compat_dev_ioctl
functions calling the same dev_ifsioc{,_locked} functions.

	Arnd <><

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-07  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-06 20:42 [PATCH] net/core: split dev_ifsioc() according to locking Jeff Garzik
2007-10-07  0:17 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2007-10-08  7:06   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200710070217.09073.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb$(echo .)de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=jeff@garzik$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox