Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:21:27 +0200

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 10:02:59PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
...
> If this work doesn't rearm itself - yes. (otherwise, the same ->func
> can run twice _at the same time_)
> 
> But again, in this case wait_on_work() after try_to_grab_pending() == 1
> doesn't block, so we can just do
> 
> 	if (cancel_work_sync(w))
> 		w->func();
> 

...but, if it were run just before work_clear_pending()?

Jarek P.