Subject: Re: [PATCH] llc: fix skb size for test responses

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:06:52 -0300

Em Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:04:21PM -0800, Jim Westfall escreveu:
> David Miller <[email-masked]> wrote [02.24.08]:
> > From: Jim Westfall <[email-masked]>
> > Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:07:58 -0800
> > 
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > The llc test command is used for a layer2 ping and contains a variable 
> > > length payload that we must include in the response.  Use the size of the 
> > > received skb as the size of the skb we must allocate to hold the payload. 
> > > 
> > > This resolved an skb_over_panic(), when trying to copy the payload into 
> > > what was a hard coded skb of size 128.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Westfall <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > Arnaldo, please review Jim's patch, thanks!
> 
> Our of curiosity did you all get my 2nd patch?  
> 
> Subject: [PATCH] llc: dont trust payload size on test cmd
> 
> I sent it a few minutes after this one, but seems like it never made it 
> to the list.  My local smtp shows it was delivered sucussfully to 
> vger.kernel.org.

I got it, but you made a mistake on the To: address:

From: Jim Westfall <[email-masked]>
Subject: [PATCH] llc: dont trust payload size on test cmd
To: "To:netdev"@vger.kernel.org, [email-masked]