Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: rewrite fragmentation code

From: Michael Buesch <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 15:48:06 +0200

On Wednesday 07 May 2008 15:05:48 Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 01:52:13PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Why does busy exist then? Historical accident? I really really
> 
> Yes it's historical baggage.  These days the biggest users would
> be LLTX drivers which should all be converted to non-LLTX and
> drivers that don't keep track of queue status properly.

So there's no way to actually fail in a TX handler? Drivers
are doomed to drop the packet, if they cannot handle it due to
ring overflow?

-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email-masked]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html