Subject: Re: [BUG] NULL pointer dereference in skb_dequeue

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:01:26 +0000

On 10-08-2008 21:04, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> Hmm.. Actually, it's completely unreasonable. Let's forget this.

But accidentally it might even sometimes work here...

Currently, the most suspicious place to me seems to be
__netif_schedule(). Is it legal to store RCU protected pointers out of
rcu_read_lock() sections?

Jarek P.