Subject: Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation.

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:23:33 +0300

Hi Paolo.

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:19:29PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi ([email-masked]) wrote:
> Performance seems to be the most important argument in favour of pohmelfs.
> You should probably add more performance data in the cover letter of
> the patch serie. All the information are already available but not
> easy to be reached.
> In short, try to do a better work in "selling" your product :-)

I will create easily understandible graphs and put a link to them into
the description. Performance is indeed one of the interesting parts
among POHMELFS features.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov