From: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
To: hch@infradead•org
Cc: nhorman@tuxdriver•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:21:41 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090127.102141.99756103.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090127172323.GA7635@infradead.org>
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead•org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:23:23 -0500
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:20:17AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > We're merging this stuff to solve the chicken and egg
> > problem wherein the lttng tree merge is basically
> > stalled.
> >
> > If the individual subsystem annotations go in, the hope
> > is that they'll have less to merge and thus it's more likely
> > to actually happen.
>
> I'm rather concerned as I haven't seen any progress on the lttng core
> lately. I'd really prefer to have a version in close to mergeable shape
> first, that's actively beeing pushed. Adding the instrumentation is
> trivial as seen by this small patch, but getting the core right (and who
> knows if that involves changing the way actual instrumentation works, it's
> not like that hasn't changed n million times yet) is essential.
The block layer already merged trace annotations. I therefore see no
harm in merging the net bits.
If you disagree, either submit a revert of the block layer
annotations, or content yourself in being a hypocrite :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-27 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-26 19:59 [PATCH] net: add tracepoints to socket api Neil Horman
2009-01-27 1:22 ` David Miller
2009-01-27 1:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-01-27 5:57 ` David Miller
2009-01-27 12:09 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-27 14:07 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-27 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-27 17:20 ` David Miller
2009-01-27 17:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-27 18:21 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-01-27 18:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-27 20:42 ` Neil Horman
2009-01-28 21:28 ` Neil Horman
2009-02-01 10:02 ` David Miller
2009-02-01 18:53 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090127.102141.99756103.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=hch@infradead$(echo .)org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox