Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] Doc: Fix spelling in RCU/rculist_nulls.txt.

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:54:00 +0000

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:11:47PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> Trival spelling fixes in RCU/rculist_nulls.txt.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email-masked]>
> Reviewed-by: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>

Hmm... still "reviewing", and maybe it's only me, but can't apply...
(v1 works OK.)

Jarek P.

> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email-masked]>
> ---
>
>  Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
> index 239f542..6389dec 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rculist_nulls.txt
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ if (obj) {
>    /*
>     * Because a writer could delete object, and a writer could
>     * reuse these object before the RCU grace period, we
> -   * must check key after geting the reference on object
> +   * must check key after getting the reference on object
>     */
>    if (obj->key != key) { // not the object we expected
>       put_ref(obj);
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ a race (some writer did a delete and/or a move of an object
>  to another chain) checking the final 'nulls' value if
>  the lookup met the end of chain. If final 'nulls' value
>  is not the slot number, then we must restart the lookup at
> -the begining. If the object was moved to same chain,
> +the beginning. If the object was moved to the same chain,
>  then the reader doesnt care : It might eventually
>  scan the list again without harm.
>