public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>
To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat•com>
Cc: dlaor@redhat•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	Dor Laor <dor@redhat•com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat•com>,
	virtualization@lists•linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC)
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:34:30 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200905171134.31285.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242061838.25337.8.camel@blaa>

On Tue, 12 May 2009 02:40:38 am Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Still have one FIXME in the patch worth looking at - at what point
> should we use an indirect entry rather than consuming N entries?

Is this overkill?

Rusty.

virtio: use indirect buffers based on demand (heuristic)

virtio_ring uses a ring buffer of descriptors: indirect support allows
a single descriptor to refer to a table of descriptors.  This saves
space in the ring, but requires a kmalloc/kfree.

Rather than try to figure out what the right threshold at which to use
indirect buffers, we drop the threshold dynamically when the ring is
under stress.

Note: to stress this, I reduced the ring size to 32 in lguest, and a
1G send reduced the threshold to 9.

Note2: I moved the BUG_ON()s above the indirect test, where they belong
(indirect falls thru on OOM, so the constraints still apply).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct vring_virtqueue
 
 	/* Host supports indirect buffers */
 	bool indirect;
+	/* Threshold before we go indirect. */
+	unsigned int indirect_threshold;
 
 	/* Number of free buffers */
 	unsigned int num_free;
@@ -137,6 +141,32 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vri
 	return head;
 }
 
+static void adjust_threshold(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
+			     unsigned int out, unsigned int in)
+{
+	/* There are really two species of virtqueue, and it matters here.
+	 * If there are no output parts, it's a "normally full" receive queue,
+	 * otherwise it's a "normally empty" send queue. */
+	if (out) {
+		/* Leave threshold unless we're full. */
+		if (out + in < vq->num_free)
+			return;
+	} else {
+		/* Leave threshold unless we're empty. */
+		if (vq->num_free != vq->vring.num)
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/* Never drop threshold below 1 */
+	vq->indirect_threshold /= 2;
+	vq->indirect_threshold |= 1;
+
+	printk("%s %s: indirect threshold %u (%u+%u vs %u)\n", 
+	       dev_name(&vq->vq.vdev->dev),
+	       vq->vq.name, vq->indirect_threshold,
+	       out, in, vq->num_free);
+}
+
 static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 			 struct scatterlist sg[],
 			 unsigned int out,
@@ -149,18 +179,31 @@ static int vring_add_buf(struct virtqueu
 	START_USE(vq);
 
 	BUG_ON(data == NULL);
-
-	/* If the host supports indirect descriptor tables, and we have multiple
-	 * buffers, then go indirect. FIXME: tune this threshold */
-	if (vq->indirect && (out + in) > 1 && vq->num_free) {
-		head = vring_add_indirect(vq, sg, out, in);
-		if (head != vq->vring.num)
-			goto add_head;
-	}
-
 	BUG_ON(out + in > vq->vring.num);
 	BUG_ON(out + in == 0);
 
+	/* If the host supports indirect descriptor tables, consider it. */
+	if (vq->indirect) {
+		bool try_indirect;
+
+		/* We tweak the threshold automatically. */
+		adjust_threshold(vq, out, in);
+
+		/* If we can't fit any at all, fall through. */
+		if (vq->num_free == 0)
+			try_indirect = false;
+		else if (out + in > vq->num_free)
+			try_indirect = true;
+		else
+			try_indirect = (out + in > vq->indirect_threshold);
+
+		if (try_indirect) {
+			head = vring_add_indirect(vq, sg, out, in);
+			if (head != vq->vring.num)
+				goto add_head;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (vq->num_free < out + in) {
 		pr_debug("Can't add buf len %i - avail = %i\n",
 			 out + in, vq->num_free);
@@ -391,6 +434,7 @@ struct virtqueue *vring_new_virtqueue(un
 #endif
 
 	vq->indirect = virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
+	vq->indirect_threshold = num;
 
 	/* No callback?  Tell other side not to bother us. */
 	if (!callback)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-17  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1229620222-22216-1-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <1229620222-22216-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <1229620222-22216-3-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com>
2009-04-21 12:59     ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) Mark McLoughlin
2009-04-27  7:43       ` Dor Laor
2009-05-04  2:19         ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-11 17:10           ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-11 17:11             ` [PATCH 1/3] virtio: teach virtio_has_feature() about transport features Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-11 17:11               ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-11 17:11                 ` [PATCH 3/3] lguest: add support for indirect ring entries Mark McLoughlin
2009-05-12 14:23             ` [PATCH 2/3] virtio: indirect ring entries (VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) Rusty Russell
2009-05-17  2:04             ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-05-17  6:27               ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-17 14:16                 ` Rusty Russell
2009-05-17 15:05                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-19  8:15                     ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200905171134.31285.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
    --cc=avi@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dlaor@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=dor@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=markmc@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists$(echo .)linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox