Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc()

From: David Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:02:20 -0700 (PDT)

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000

> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
>> 
>> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
>> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
>> sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
>> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
> 
> Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling.

I will :-)