Em Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 06:21:13PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 05:09:19PM +0300, Nir Tzachar escreveu:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > Below are some test results with the patch (only part 1, as I did not
> > manage to apply part 2).
> 
> I forgot to mention that the patches were made against DaveM's
> net-next-2.6 tree at:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6
> 
> If you have a linux-2.6 git tree, just do:
> 
> cd linux-2.6
> git remote add net-next git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6
> git branch -b net-next-recvmmsg net-next/master
> 
> And you should be able to apply the two patches cleanly.

Strange, I just checked out v2.6.31 and only one hunk in the _first_
patch (adding the recvmmsg entry in the sparc 32 syscall table) failed,
the second applied with just minor offsets.

You must have corrupted the patch when saving somehow, anyway, find
both, against v2.6.31, attached.

Back to building the kernel on 10 Gbit/s hardware.

- Arnaldo