Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 03/15] igb: update the approach taken to acquiring and releasing the phy lock

From: Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:32:07 -0700

From: Alexander Duyck <[email-masked]>

The current approach is just using a ?: type mechanism to set the phy
locking bit.  This if fine for now but limits us to only 2.  Switch to a
nested if statement for future compatiblity with more than 2 phys.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <[email-masked]>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email-masked]>
---

 drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c |   11 +++++++----
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c b/drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c
index 5604b3e..65b9000 100644
--- a/drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c
+++ b/drivers/net/igb/e1000_82575.c
@@ -240,9 +240,10 @@ static s32 igb_get_invariants_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
  **/
 static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 {
-	u16 mask;
+	u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
 
-	mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
+	if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
+		mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
 
 	return igb_acquire_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
 }
@@ -256,9 +257,11 @@ static s32 igb_acquire_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
  **/
 static void igb_release_phy_82575(struct e1000_hw *hw)
 {
-	u16 mask;
+	u16 mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
+
+	if (hw->bus.func == E1000_FUNC_1)
+		mask = E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM;
 
-	mask = hw->bus.func ? E1000_SWFW_PHY1_SM : E1000_SWFW_PHY0_SM;
 	igb_release_swfw_sync_82575(hw, mask);
 }