Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x

From: Jarek Poplawski <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:38:36 +0000

On 11-11-2009 23:48, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Frans Pop <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> Caleb Cushing <[email-masked]> writes:
>>>>> I'm attaching the bisection log and a 'good' dmesg output.
>>>>>
>>>>> c9fb3ded7a8a6769f3bcb3ef3d9aed61d3e376a9 is the first bad commit
>>> Just gives fatal: bad object c9fb3ded7a8a6769f3bcb3ef3d9aed61d3e376a9
>>> here on a standard Linus linux-2.6 tree.
>> Looks to be a commit from a stable update:
>>
>> commit c9fb3ded7a8a6769f3bcb3ef3d9aed61d3e376a9
>> Author: Alan Stern <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Â  Tue Sep 1 11:38:34 2009 -0400
>>
>> Â  Â usb-serial: change referencing of port and serial structures
>>
>> Â  Â commit 41bd34ddd7aa46dbc03b5bb33896e0fa8100fe7b upstream.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> FJP
>>
> 
> yeah it is. it's from greg kroah-hartman's tree.

Could you answer the previous question too:

On 11-11-2009 22:47, Andi Kleen wrote:
...
> It might be also useful if you could describe what kind
> of network devices you use and how you determine
> the packet loss.

Btw, you didn't send the stats you compared, and your wireshark dump
doesn't show anything wrong either.

Jarek P.