Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2010-02-10

From: "John W. Linville" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:32:28 -0500

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:25:40PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "John W. Linville" <[email-masked]>
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:19:54 -0500
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:36:58AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Johannes Berg <[email-masked]>
> >> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:15:37 +0100
> >> 
> >> > It was intentional -- that sdev doesn't even have an irq member, but
> >> > nobody ever noticed because of the wrong ifdef.
> >> 
> >> Ok, then this needs to be explained in the commit message.
> > 
> > OK...mind if I just revert the current version and ask Michael to
> > resubmit with an appropriate changelog entry?
> 
> Have you pulled this tree into others already?  Why not
> just pop out the commit and fix it's commit message, then
> reapply?
> 
> Having the revert commit in there is really stupid just for this.

I have it pulled into wireless-next-2.6 to fix a merge conflict (from
a latter commit).  It is also pulled into wireless-testing but that
is obviously less of an issue.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email-masked]			might be all we have.  Be ready.