Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: add ioctl to modify vnet header size

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:35:04 +0200

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 02:10:11PM -0700, David Stevens wrote:
> Shouldn't we enforce a maximum too? Esp. if overflow/underflow
> will break any of the checks when it's used.
> 
>                                 +-DLS

So the maximum is MAX_INT :)
I don't think it can break any checks that aren't
already broken - what do you have in mind?

-- 
MST