Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv6: Replace inet6_ifaddr->dead with state

From: Stephen Hemminger <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:23:34 -0700

On Tue, 18 May 2010 21:04:19 +1000
Herbert Xu <[email-masked]> wrote:

>  
> +enum {
> +	INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DAD,
> +	INET6_IFADDR_STATE_POSTDAD,
> +	INET6_IFADDR_STATE_UP,
> +	INET6_IFADDR_STATE_DEAD,
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__

Does this really need to be visible to user applications?

--