public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail•com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail•com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta•com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash•net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:33:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100609113329.GC7308@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276076350.2442.90.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
...
> Here is v2 of patch, adding protection in gen_estimator_active() as
> well.
> 
> [PATCH net-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock
> 
> gen_kill_estimator() / gen_new_estimator() is not always called with
> RTNL held.
> 
> net/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.c is one user of these API that do not hold
> RTNL, so random corruptions can occur between "tc" and "iptables".
> 
> Add a new fine grained lock instead of trying to use RTNL in netfilter.

Btw, maybe it's a different case, but RTNL happens in netfilter already
(nf_conntrack_helper.c, nf_conntrack_proto.c).

It would be nice to mention Changli's argument that
gen_replace_estimator isn't atomic operation after this change.

> @@ -312,8 +315,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gen_replace_estimator);
>  bool gen_estimator_active(const struct gnet_stats_basic_packed *bstats,
>  			  const struct gnet_stats_rate_est *rate_est)
>  {
> +	bool res;
> +
>  	ASSERT_RTNL();

This line should go away as well.

I'm OK with this patch unless there is an alternative xt_RATEEST RTNL
fix available.

Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-09 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07 14:32 [PATCH net-next-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 14:53 ` Changli Gao
2010-06-07 15:30   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 15:55     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 16:56       ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 17:18         ` [PATCH net-2.6] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: add a new lock Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  1:00           ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:30             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  4:57               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  4:58             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08  5:20               ` Changli Gao
2010-06-08  5:39                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:39           ` [PATCH net-2.6 v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 11:33             ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2010-06-09 11:55               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-11  5:54             ` David Miller
2010-06-08 12:15         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: kill est_lock rwlock Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 12:27           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 12:40             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:29               ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 19:45                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 20:24                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-08 20:52                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 21:18                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  6:13                       ` pkt_sched: gen_estimator: more fuel for Jarek and Changli Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  6:51                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  7:36                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  8:14                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09  9:40         ` [PATCH] pkt_sched: gen_kill_estimator() rcu fixes Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09  9:56           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 10:41             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 12:09               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 12:50                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-06-09 13:05                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-12  1:39                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100609113329.GC7308@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox