Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bluetooth: Use printf extension %pMbt

From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 18:07:51 -0200

Hi Joe,

* Joe Perches <[email-masked]> [2010-12-06 10:50:13 -0800]:

> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 16:15 -0200, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
> > This patch doesn't apply to the bluetooth-next-2.6 tree.
> > Can you please rebase it against the bluetooth-next-2.6 tree?
> 
> No worries, it was done against next-20101202.
> 
> Do you care about using %pMR vs %pMbt as Michał suggested in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/4/21 ?

I'm fine either way. It depends more if another subsystem will want to use
%pMR or not as you said.

-- 
Gustavo F. Padovan
http://profusion.mobi