Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next-2.6] netfilter: ip_tables: dont block BH while reading counters

From: Stephen Hemminger <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:31:49 -0800

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:53:56 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]> wrote:

>  	spinlock_t lock;
> +	seqcount_t seq;

Since lock and seqcount_t are associated together, why isn't this a seqlock instead?

--