Subject: Re: Question about tg3 and bnx2 driver suppliers

From: Stephen Hemminger <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:41:15 -0800

On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:17:00 +0100
Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 février 2011 à 19:19 +0100, Micha Nelissen a écrit :
> > Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > One possible cause of packet drops is when softirqs are disabled for too
> > > long periods, even if NIC has a big RX ring (check ethtool -g eth0)
> > 
> > Why aren't the softirqs converted to workqueues? Wouldn't that cut 
> > dependencies to other softirq users and improve latency?
> > 
> 
> Because it was done like that in the old days.
> 
> Its a bit less important these days, now typical machines have 8+ cpus.
> Each device interrupt can be handled by its own cpu :)

The latency to schedule a work queue is still much higher
than the latency to do a softirq. Last time I played around with it,
things like loopback performance dropped 10% if using work queue.