Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

From: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:33:58 +0400

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 09:11:32PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:46:12PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > +int tcp_init_cgroup_fill(struct proto *prot, struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > +			 struct cgroup_subsys *ss)
> > +{
> > +	prot->enter_memory_pressure	= tcp_enter_memory_pressure;
> > +	prot->memory_allocated		= memory_allocated_tcp;
> > +	prot->prot_mem			= tcp_sysctl_mem;
> > +	prot->sockets_allocated		= sockets_allocated_tcp;
> > +	prot->memory_pressure		= memory_pressure_tcp;
> 
> No fancy formatting, please.
> 

What's wrong with having fancy formatting? It's indeed easier to read
when members are assigned this way. It's always up to maintainer to
choose what he prefers, but I see nothing wrong in such style (if only it
doesn't break the style of the whole file).

	Cyrill

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email-masked].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email-masked]"> [email-masked] </a>