Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks

From: Andrew Morton <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:09:17 -0800

Speaking of which, I just got this:

WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu
#142: FILE: fs/locks.c:2335:
+                       seq_printf(f, "Start-end:\t %Ld-EOF\n\n", fl->fl_start);

But %L saves a byte!  Why did we do this?  Don't you like puppies?