public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: herbert@gondor•hengli.com.au, netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: Namespaces and inetpeer
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:58:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120312095840.GM15404@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120312.023505.2024370184180125281.davem@davemloft.net>

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 02:35:05AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet•com>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:57:56 +0100
> 
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:25:29AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> Hi:
> >> 
> >> While looking through the inetpeer code I noticed that there is
> >> no namespace support at all.  This means that metric and other
> >> information will be leaking across namespaces.  As IP addresses
> >> are meant to be independent between them, this is not a good thing.
> >> 
> > 
> > Actually, it would be nice if we could have an inetpeer base per
> > fib table. This would imply namespace awareness and it would
> > handle the problem when we have mulitiple routes (with different
> > metrics etc.) to the same ip address on policy routing.
> 
> Then you will ask for one per security policy too, to handle IPSEC.

Hm, I don't see why this would be needed too.

It was just an idea to handle the metrcis with policy routing.
Better ideas are very welcome of course :)

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-12  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-10 13:25 Namespaces and inetpeer Herbert Xu
2012-03-12  8:57 ` Steffen Klassert
2012-03-12  9:35   ` David Miller
2012-03-12  9:58     ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2012-03-12 10:05       ` David Miller
2012-03-12 12:11   ` Herbert Xu
2012-03-13  9:41     ` Steffen Klassert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120312095840.GM15404@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor$(echo .)hengli.com.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox