Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: nfc: fix panic in accept()

From: "John W. Linville" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:42:54 -0400

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:56:12PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:11:38PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Hi Samuel,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email-masked]> wrote:
> > > Hi Eric,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:53:32PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >> From: Eric Dumazet <[email-masked]>
> > >>
> > >> Sasha Levin reported following panic :
> > > I applied a similar patch, more consistent with the rest of the NFC socket
> > > code, still with you as the author. See here:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sameo/nfc-3.0.git;a=commit;h=631c301f20558525a641fadffc0126affd3dc4a4
> > 
> > Could this tree be included in -next please?
> No, wireless-next is already included in -next. The above patch is making its
> way upstream, it's in the wireless.git tree and should hit davem's net tree
> soon.

FWIW, lots (or most?) of the bug fix trees get pulled into -next
as well.  Having the nfc tree go there makes sense to me.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email-masked]			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email-masked]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html