Subject: Re: [stable 2.6.32.y PATCH 0/6] net: fixes for cached dsts are never invalidated

From: Benjamin LaHaise <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:18:03 -0400

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:03:18PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> OK. Is is because the issue is less important there or because the fix are
> more risky than the issues they fix (or any other reason) ?

The behaviour of 2.6.32.x is certainly a regression from previous stable 
kernels used by various distributions (ie 2.6.18), and is quite serious 
for those of us running routers on top of these releases.

		-ben
-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."