From: Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo•de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists•open-mesh.org
Cc: Pau Koning <paukoning@gmail•com>,
netdev@vger•kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation•org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH 1/7] batman-adv: Move soft-interface initialization to ndo_init
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:37:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212250337.48595.lindner_marek@yahoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiGF98L_Ca20Eb+qVuX1126rWoeqQzOASshB7c2LQ-Fi7DiXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, December 24, 2012 23:36:03 Pau Koning wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Marek Lindner <lindner_marek@yahoo•de>
wrote:
> > On Monday, December 24, 2012 22:22:44 Pau Koning wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation•org>
wrote:
> >> > The initialization of an net_device object should be done in the
> >> > init/constructor function and not from the outside after the
> >> > register_netdevice was done to avoid race conditions.
> >>
> >> This patchset seems to be similar. Shouldn't it have been part of
> >> 3.8-rc1 or got rejected? Neither of it happened in the last month
> >
> > It was discussed and a decision was made. Please read all mails in this
> > thread before making noise.
>
> What decision? I only see something about Patch 6 and Patch 7: Antonio
> Quartulli doesn't want rtnetlink support in batman-adv. I don't see
> any other statement about the rest of the patchset.
Quoting Antonio:
>>>
Anyway, I discussed about this together with the others and it seems
that a proper solution now is to wait before merging this patchset and fix the
current sysfs/rtnl_lock problem first. What do you think?
Adding a new API without fixing the current one doesn't sound like a good
move.
<<<
What isn't clear ?
Cheers,
Marek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-24 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-24 0:02 [PATCH 1/7] batman-adv: Move soft-interface initialization to ndo_init Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] batman-adv: Move deinitialization of soft-interface to destructor Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] batman-adv: Don't always delete softif when last slave was removed Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] batman-adv: Remove slave interfaces before removing master interface Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] batman-adv: Allow to postpone softif unregistration Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] batman-adv: Allow to use rntl_link for device creation/deletion Sven Eckelmann
[not found] ` <20121201131108.GL24115@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <20121201131108.GL24115-E/2OGukznS5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-01 13:16 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-01 13:28 ` Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Antonio Quartulli
[not found] ` <20121201132802.GM24115-E/2OGukznS5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-01 13:39 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-01 14:54 ` Re: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Antonio Quartulli
2012-11-24 0:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] batman-adv: Allow to modify slaves of soft-interfaces through rntl_link Sven Eckelmann
2012-11-24 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] batman-adv: Move soft-interface initialization to ndo_init David Miller
[not found] ` <20121124.155902.1261596975089040930.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-24 21:23 ` Sven Eckelmann
2012-12-24 14:22 ` Pau Koning
[not found] ` <CANiGF9_=svx+W4Rhx8BL1NBv0H1aULeh71sX9YkMeR66OmmimA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-24 14:37 ` Marek Lindner
[not found] ` <201212242237.07208.lindner_marek-LWAfsSFWpa4@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-24 15:36 ` Pau Koning
2012-12-24 19:37 ` Marek Lindner [this message]
2012-12-24 23:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Pau Koning
[not found] ` <CANiGF9_4QP0ts2kV9Bruk_8L7h1870LMcrRhtsYu35q=COF0hQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-12-25 8:19 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201212250337.48595.lindner_marek@yahoo.de \
--to=lindner_marek@yahoo$(echo .)de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists$(echo .)open-mesh.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=paukoning@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=sven@narfation$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox