From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo•org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: bhutchings@solarflare•com, libc-alpha@sourceware•org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6•org, amwang@redhat•com, tmb@mageia•org,
eblake@redhat•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, libvirt-list@redhat•com,
tgraf@suug•ch, schwab@suse•de, carlos@systemhalted•org
Subject: Re: Redefinition of struct in6_addr in <netinet/in.h> and <linux/in6.h>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:22:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301161422.19202.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116.135959.90676245194307972.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 895 bytes --]
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 13:59:59 David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo•org>
> > if you're not calling the kernel directly, why are you including the
> > kernel headers ? what is the problem people are actually trying to
> > address here (and no, "i want to include both headers" is not the
> > answer) ?
>
> When GLIBC doesn't provide it's own definition of some networking
> macros or interfaces that the kernel provides, people include the
> kernel header.
sounds like glibc's headers are out of date and we should update them to
include the missing definitions
but this is still too vague. what headers/definitions do people want to see
simultaneously included ? changes would be needed on both sides (kernel & C
library).
> This has been done for decades, wake up.
and it's been broken for just as long. no need to be a dick.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-13 18:38 if_bridge.h: include in6.h for struct in6_addr use Thomas Backlund
2013-01-13 20:05 ` Thomas Backlund
2013-01-14 23:57 ` [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2013-01-15 10:03 ` [libvirt] the patch "bridge: export multicast database via netlink" broke kernel 3.8 uapi (was: Re: if_bridge.h: include in6.h for struct in6_addr use) Thomas Backlund
2013-01-15 10:11 ` the patch "bridge: export multicast database via netlink" broke kernel 3.8 uapi (was: Re: [libvirt] " Cong Wang
2013-01-15 10:55 ` the patch "bridge: export multicast database via netlink" broke kernel 3.8 uapi Thomas Backlund
2013-01-16 5:51 ` Cong Wang
2013-01-16 6:06 ` Redefinition of struct in6_addr in <netinet/in.h> and <linux/in6.h> Cong Wang
2013-01-16 14:21 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-16 15:47 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-16 17:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-16 17:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-16 17:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-16 18:59 ` David Miller
2013-01-16 19:22 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2013-01-16 19:25 ` David Miller
2013-01-17 3:40 ` Cong Wang
2013-01-17 3:55 ` [libvirt] " Jike Song
2013-01-17 6:59 ` Cong Wang
2013-01-17 7:02 ` Cong Wang
2013-01-16 18:57 ` David Miller
2013-01-16 19:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-17 2:15 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-17 3:10 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-17 3:15 ` David Miller
2013-01-18 4:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-18 4:22 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-18 4:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-18 10:44 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-18 13:35 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-18 14:24 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-18 14:36 ` Pedro Alves
2013-01-18 14:54 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-21 0:54 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-17 3:22 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-18 4:13 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-16 21:45 ` David Miller
2013-01-17 1:58 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-01-17 2:05 ` David Miller
2013-01-17 10:57 ` Jan Engelhardt
2013-01-18 4:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-01-18 4:55 ` David Miller
2013-01-18 5:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-03-13 15:17 ` [libvirt] if_bridge.h: include in6.h for struct in6_addr use Kumar Gala
2013-03-13 16:24 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301161422.19202.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo$(echo .)org \
--cc=amwang@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare$(echo .)com \
--cc=carlos@systemhalted$(echo .)org \
--cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
--cc=eblake@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware$(echo .)org \
--cc=libvirt-list@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse$(echo .)de \
--cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
--cc=tmb@mageia$(echo .)org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox