public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding•com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:37:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131022063714.GI1544@neomailbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131022.022525.2068838304168924147.davem@davemloft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1014 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 02:25:25AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@meshcoding•com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:06:35 +0200
> 
> > But rx_hook() does not receive any skb:
> > 
> > 609                 np->rx_hook(np, ntohs(uh->source),
> > 610                                (char *)(uh+1),
> > 611                                ulen - sizeof(struct udphdr));
> > 
> > it just receives a pointer to the data and can't do anything to make it linear.
> > (uh is a pointer to the udp header). Am I missing something?
> 
> Then this hook's API needs to be fixed, it's completely broken.
> 
> Make it pass the SKB and the appropriate offset (from skb->data) in
> bytes.
> 

Ok I will do that. But I think this API change must go into net-next, right?
Otherwise we would break every existing user.

What about resending this patch to net (after having removed the pskb_may_pull()
as pointed out by Eric) and then fixing the API in net-next?

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-22  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-21 21:31 [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-21 22:23 ` David Miller
2013-10-22  6:06   ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22  6:25     ` David Miller
2013-10-22  6:37       ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-10-22  6:50         ` David Miller
2013-10-22  8:48           ` [PATCH net] netpoll: fix rx_hook() interface by passing the skb Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22  9:09             ` David Laight
2013-10-22 10:11               ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 12:46                 ` David Laight
2013-10-22 17:13                   ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-22 19:40                     ` David Miller
2013-10-23  8:33                     ` David Laight
2013-10-23 10:28                       ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 11:18                         ` David Laight
2013-10-23 12:44                           ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-23 20:16                             ` David Miller
2013-10-23 21:36                               ` [PATCHv2 " Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-24  8:43                                 ` David Laight
2013-10-24 12:01                                   ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-10-24 17:53                                   ` David Miller
2013-10-25 23:27                                 ` David Miller
2013-10-21 22:25 ` [PATCH net] netpoll: linearize skb before accessing its data Eric Dumazet
2013-10-21 22:33   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131022063714.GI1544@neomailbox.net \
    --to=antonio@meshcoding$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox