public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt•eu>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, Arnaud Ebalard <arno@natisbad•org>,
	edumazet@google•com, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail•com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Re: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:15:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120181532.GM8581@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384969222.10637.20.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:40:22AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 18:34 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 
> > One important point, I was looking for the other patch you pointed
> > in this long thread and finally found it :
> > 
> > > So
> > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=98e09386c0ef4dfd48af7ba60ff908f0d525cdee
> > > 
> > > restored this minimal amount of buffering, and let the bigger amount for
> > > 40Gb NICs ;)
> > 
> > This one definitely restores original performance, so it's a much better
> > bet in my opinion :-)
> 
> I don't understand. I thought you were using this patch.

No, I was on latest stable (3.10.19) which exhibits the regression but does
not yet have your fix above. Then I tested the patch your proposed in this
thread, then this latest one. Since the patch is not yet even in Linus'
tree, I'm not sure Arnaud has tried it yet.

> I guess we are spending time on a already solved problem.

That's possible indeed. Sorry if I was not clear enough, I tried.

Regards,
Willy

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-10 13:53 [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12  6:48 ` Cong Wang
2013-11-12  7:56   ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12  8:36     ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12  9:14       ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-12 10:01         ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-12 15:34           ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13  7:22             ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 14:19               ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-17 17:41                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19  6:44                   ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-19 13:53                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 17:43                       ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 18:31                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-19 18:41                           ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-19 23:53                             ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20  0:08                               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20  0:35                                 ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20  0:43                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20  0:52                                     ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20  8:50                               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-20 19:11                               ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:26                                 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:28                                 ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-20 21:54                                   ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21  0:44                                     ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 18:38                                       ` ARM network performance and dma_mask (was: [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s) Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 19:04                                         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-21 21:51                                           ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:01                                         ` ARM network performance and dma_mask Rob Herring
2013-11-21 22:13                                           ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 21:51                                       ` [BUG,REGRESSION?] 3.11.6+,3.12: GbE iface rate drops to few KB/s Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 21:52                                         ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-21 22:00                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-21 22:55                                             ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-21 23:23                                               ` Rick Jones
2013-11-20 17:12                   ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:30                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 17:38                       ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 18:52                       ` David Miller
2013-11-20 17:34                     ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 17:40                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:15                         ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2013-11-20 18:21                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-20 18:29                             ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-20 19:22                           ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-18 10:09                 ` David Laight
2013-11-18 10:52                   ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 10:26                 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-11-18 10:44                   ` Simon Guinot
2013-11-18 16:54                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-11-18 17:13                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-18 10:51                   ` Willy Tarreau
2013-11-18 17:58                     ` Florian Fainelli
2013-11-12 14:39     ` [PATCH] tcp: tsq: restore minimal amount of queueing Eric Dumazet
2013-11-12 15:24       ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-11-13 14:06       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 14:32       ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 21:18         ` Arnaud Ebalard
2013-11-13 21:59           ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-13 23:40             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 23:52               ` Holger Hoffstaette
2013-11-17 23:15                 ` Francois Romieu
2013-11-18 16:26                   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-11-18 16:47                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-13 22:41           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-11-14 21:26         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131120181532.GM8581@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt$(echo .)eu \
    --cc=arno@natisbad$(echo .)org \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox