Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] vhost: avoid large order allocations

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 18:15:27 +0300

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:29:58PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Please dont' do this, extra indirection hurts performance.
> > Instead, please change vhost_net_open and scsi to allocate the whole
> > structure with vmalloc if kmalloc fails, along the lines of
> > 74d332c13b2148ae934ea94dac1745ae92efe8e5
> 
> Back in January 2013, you didn't seem to think it was a good idea:
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/492

Hmm true, and Dave thought the structure's too large.
I'll have to do some benchmarks to see what the effect
of Michael's patch is, performance-wise.
If it's too expensive I can pick up your patch, no need to
repost.

-- 
MST