public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat•com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail•com>,
	davem@davemloft•net, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte•hu>,
	Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux•intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: exit busy loop when another process is runnable
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:30:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140903093008.GC4783@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5406BC19.9020009@redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:58:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 06:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The patch only try to improve the performance of busy read (and test
> results shows impressive changes). It does not change anything for busy
> poll. Considering there maybe two processes in one cpu, one is doing
> busy read and one is doing busy polling. This patch may in fact help the
> busy polling performance in this case.
> 
> It's good to discuss the ideas of busy poll together, but it was out of
> the scope of this patch. We can try to do optimization on top.

No thta's just wrong, blocked read and blocking select should behave the
same.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-03  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-21  8:05 [PATCH net-next 1/2] sched: introduce nr_running_this_cpu() Jason Wang
2014-08-21  8:05 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: exit busy loop when another process is runnable Jason Wang
2014-08-21  8:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-08-22  2:53     ` Jason Wang
2014-08-21 19:03   ` Amos Kong
2014-08-22  5:01   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-08-22  7:29     ` Jason Wang
2014-08-22  7:42       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-29  3:08         ` Jason Wang
2014-09-01  6:39           ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-02  3:29             ` Jason Wang
2014-09-02  6:15               ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-02  7:37                 ` Jason Wang
2014-09-02  8:31                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-03  6:49                   ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-03  7:33                     ` Jason Wang
2014-09-03  9:36                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-03  9:59                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-03  7:51                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-04  6:51                       ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-08-22  7:36     ` Ingo Molnar
2014-08-22  9:08       ` Jason Wang
2014-08-22 14:16         ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-25  2:54           ` Jason Wang
2014-08-25 13:16           ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-08-26  7:16             ` Jason Wang
2014-09-01  6:55               ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-02  3:35                 ` Jason Wang
2014-09-02  6:03                   ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-02  6:31                     ` Jason Wang
2014-09-03  6:21                       ` Eliezer Tamir
2014-09-03  6:59                         ` Jason Wang
2016-04-14  0:55                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-03  8:09       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-11 16:31       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-13  7:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 13:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-13 13:51           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-14  0:58             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-01  9:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-01  9:52       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-01 10:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-01 10:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-02  4:03             ` Jason Wang
2014-09-02 10:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-03  6:58                 ` Jason Wang
2014-09-03  9:30                   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-09-01 10:22           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-02  3:38           ` Jason Wang
2014-09-02  6:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-02  7:19               ` Jason Wang
2014-08-21 13:52 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] sched: introduce nr_running_this_cpu() Ingo Molnar
2014-08-22  7:27   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140903093008.GC4783@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=eliezer.tamir@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte$(echo .)hu \
    --cc=mst@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox