public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft•net>
Cc: pagupta@redhat•com, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, jasowang@redhat•com, dgibson@redhat•com,
	vfalico@gmail•com, edumazet@google•com, vyasevic@redhat•com,
	hkchu@google•com, wuzhy@linux•vnet.ibm.com, xemul@parallels•com,
	therbert@google•com, bhutchings@solarflare•com, xii@google•com,
	stephen@networkplumber•org, jiri@resnulli•us,
	sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded•com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:02:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141124080243.GD6286@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141123.202321.1426718936320546377.davem@davemloft.net>

On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:23:21PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>
> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 22:30:32 +0200
> 
> > qemu runs in the host, but it's unpriveledged: it gets
> > passed tun FDs by a priveledged daemon, and it only
> > has the rights to some operations,
> > in particular to attach and detach queues.
> > 
> > The assumption always was that this operation is safe
> > and can't make kernel run out of resources.
> 
> This creates a rather rediculous situation in my opinion.
> 
> Configuring a network device is a privileged operation, the daemon
> should be setting this thing up.
> 
> In no other context would we have to worry about something like this.

Right.  Jason corrected me.  I got it wrong:
what qemu does is TUNSETQUEUE and that needs to get a queue
that's already initialized by the daemon.

To create new queues daemon calls TUNSETIFF,
and that already can be used to create new devices,
so it's a priveledged operation.

This means it's safe to just drop the restriction,
exactly as you suggested originally.
-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-18 16:22 [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-18 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: allow large number of rx queues Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-18 20:29   ` Cong Wang
2014-11-20 16:31     ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-18 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] tuntap: Accept tuntap maximum number of queues as sysctl Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-18 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] tuntap: reduce the size of tun_struct by using flex array Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-18 16:22 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] tuntap: Increase the number of queues in tun Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-19  1:43 ` [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-19 20:16 ` David Miller
2014-11-19 20:44   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-23  5:22     ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-23 10:46     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-23 18:43       ` David Miller
2014-11-23 20:30         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-11-24  1:23           ` David Miller
2014-11-24  8:02             ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2014-11-24 14:28               ` Pankaj Gupta
2014-11-24  3:23       ` Jason Wang
2014-11-24  7:55         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141124080243.GD6286@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare$(echo .)com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dgibson@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=edumazet@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hkchu@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pagupta@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded$(echo .)com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber$(echo .)org \
    --cc=therbert@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=wuzhy@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels$(echo .)com \
    --cc=xii@google$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox