public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome•com>
To: Joe Harvell <joe.harvell@tekcomms•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemming@brocade•com>,
	Vadim Kochan <vadim4j@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: enhance addr label validation
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 09:22:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325002251.GE23124@vergenet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55103487.5070903@tekcomms.com>

Hi Joe,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:03AM -0500, Joe Harvell wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Joe,
> >>
> >>On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 03:14:53PM -0500, Joe Harvell wrote:
> >>>The ip addr command today rejects address labels that would break
> >>>ifconfig.  However, it allows some labels which still break it. Enhance
> >>>enforcement to reject all known incompatible labels, and allow the
> >>>existing -force option to allow someone to use a label even if it is
> >>>not
> >>>ifconfig compatible
> >>I am concerned this will break existing users who are relying on setting
> >>labels that would now be rejected without using -force.
> >>
> >[snip]
> >
> >Simon,
> >
> >Good point.  I propose the following:
> >
> >When a label is specified without -force, and that label begins with the
> >interface
> >name but is followed by something other than a colon, accept the label but
> >emit
> >a warning message indicating this label is incompatible with ifconfig and
> >that later
> >versions of the 'ip address' command may reject it.  This message can also
> >indicate
> >that -force can be specified to explicitly indicate a label that is non
> >ifconfig compatible
> >is desired.
> >
> >At some point in the future, the behavior could then be changed to reject
> >such labels.
> >
> >What do you think?
> >
> >---
> >Joe
>
> Ok, I made the changes I propose above, and have pushed them to
> 'git@github•com:jharvell/iproute2.git addr-label-noncompat' with a new
> signoff commit (303f46819883d4c808974629a6d3515102c5c0d0) that summarizes
> all the changes from master.  But I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do
> with respect to the patch in patchwork to designate that I want the new
> code to be merged instead of before the change.  Do I reject this patch
> request and submit another one?  Do I send an email with the same subject
> as this one with the new patch against master?

To some extent this is up to Stephen, who is the maintainer.
But I expect the following should be close to the mark:

1. If you new patch has the same title as the previous patch then
   you can post it as [PATCH v2] and it should be fairly clear that
   it supersedes the previous version.

2. If you new patch has a different title then there could be a note
  in response to it noting that it has been superseded. In effect your
  previous email is such a note.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-21 20:14 [PATCH] iproute2: enhance addr label validation Joe Harvell
2015-03-23  1:15 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-23 14:02   ` Joe Harvell
2015-03-23 15:43     ` Joe Harvell
2015-03-25  0:22       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2015-03-25  0:23     ` Simon Horman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-21 20:00 Joe Harvell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150325002251.GE23124@vergenet.net \
    --to=simon.horman@netronome$(echo .)com \
    --cc=joe.harvell@tekcomms$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=shemming@brocade$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vadim4j@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox