Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] xfrm: simplify xfrm_address_t use

From: Jiri Benc <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:35:21 +0200

On Tue, 7 Apr 2015 18:29:58 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote:
> What could be done that should work with earlier glibc versions is
> including "utils.h" before <linux/xfrm.h> in xfrm_monitor.c. Could you
> try that? Would it be an acceptable workaround?

Or, better, include <netinet/in.h> before <linux/xfrm.h> in
xfrm_monitor.c to keep the order of inclusion of local and system
headers.

 Jiri

-- 
Jiri Benc