public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink•fr>
To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat•com>
Cc: netdev@vger•kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft•net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba•org>,
	Oleksii Berezhniak <core@irc•lg.ua>,
	Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis•co.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ppp: don't override sk->sk_state in pppoe_flush_dev()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:24:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151013072408.GG2882@alphalink.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85baa6ab4293c475d0b4b26192694239@visp.net.lb>

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:13:54AM +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On 2015-10-07 15:12, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:08:44PM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> >> 	if (po) {
> >> 		struct sock *sk = sk_pppox(po);
> >>
> >>-		bh_lock_sock(sk);
> >>-
> >>-		/* If the user has locked the socket, just ignore
> >>-		 * the packet.  With the way two rcv protocols hook into
> >>-		 * one socket family type, we cannot (easily) distinguish
> >>-		 * what kind of SKB it is during backlog rcv.
> >>-		 */
> >>-		if (sock_owned_by_user(sk) == 0) {
> >>-			/* We're no longer connect at the PPPOE layer,
> >>-			 * and must wait for ppp channel to disconnect us.
> >>-			 */
> >>-			sk->sk_state = PPPOX_ZOMBIE;
> >>-		}
> >>-
> >>-		bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> >> 		if (!schedule_work(&po->proto.pppoe.padt_work))
> >> 			sock_put(sk);
> >> 	}
> >>
> >Finally, I think I'll keep this approach for net-next, to completely
> >remove PPPOX_ZOMBIE.
> >For now, let's just avoid any assumption about the relationship between
> >the PPPOX_ZOMBIE state and the value of po->pppoe_dev, as suggested by
> >Matt.
> >
> >Denys, can you let me know if your issue goes away with the following
> >patch?
> >---
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> >index 2ed7506..5e0b432 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
> >@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int pppoe_release(struct socket *sock)
> >
> > 	po = pppox_sk(sk);
> >
> >-	if (sk->sk_state & (PPPOX_CONNECTED | PPPOX_BOUND | PPPOX_ZOMBIE)) {
> >+	if (po->pppoe_dev) {
> > 		dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
> > 		po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
> > 	}
> I just got OK to upgrade server yesterday, for now around 12 hours working
> fine. I need 1-2 more days, and maybe will upgrade few more servers to say
> for sure, if it is ok or not.
> Sorry for delay, just it is production servers and at current situation they
> cannot tolerate significant downtime.
> 
That's ok. I'll send an official patch when you consider the issue to
be definitely fixed.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-13  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30  9:45 [PATCH net] ppp: don't override sk->sk_state in pppoe_flush_dev() Guillaume Nault
2015-10-02  8:01 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-10-02 17:54   ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-04 16:08     ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-10-05  4:08       ` Matt Bennett
2015-10-05 12:24         ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-06  0:26           ` Matt Bennett
2015-10-06  4:46             ` Matt Bennett
2015-10-06  9:46               ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-06 21:12                 ` Matt Bennett
2015-10-07 10:32                   ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-06  8:50             ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-05 12:08       ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-07 12:12         ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-13  2:13           ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-10-13  7:24             ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2015-10-22  0:14             ` Matt Bennett
2015-10-22  0:53               ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2015-10-22 14:49                 ` Guillaume Nault
2015-10-05 10:05 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151013072408.GG2882@alphalink.fr \
    --to=g.nault@alphalink$(echo .)fr \
    --cc=Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis$(echo .)co.nz \
    --cc=core@irc$(echo .)lg.ua \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nuclearcat@nuclearcat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox