Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tun: Rename a jump label in update_filter()

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:41:11 +0300

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 09:37:16AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 09:00:34 +0200
> 
> Adjust a jump target according to the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>

I don't have an opinion of this one. Which convention do you refer to?

> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index a1aeccb..e249428 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int update_filter(struct tap_filter *filter, void __user *arg)
>  	for (; n < uf.count; n++) {
>  		if (!is_multicast_ether_addr(addr[n].u)) {
>  			err = 0; /* no filter */
> -			goto done;
> +			goto free_addr;
>  		}
>  		addr_hash_set(filter->mask, addr[n].u);
>  	}
> @@ -769,8 +769,7 @@ static int update_filter(struct tap_filter *filter, void __user *arg)
>  
>  	/* Return the number of exact filters */
>  	err = nexact;
> -
> -done:
> +free_addr:
>  	kfree(addr);
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.9.3