Subject: Re: [1/3] hostap: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation

From: Kalle Valo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:19:44 +0000 (UTC)

SF Markus Elfring <[email-masked]> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:19:43 +0200
> 
> Reuse existing functionality from memdup_user() instead of keeping
> duplicate source code.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <[email-masked]>

Patch set to Rejected.

[1/3] hostap: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating i... 2016-08-20 SF Markus El Rejected

Reason: A similar patch is already applied.

Applying: hostap: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0001 hostap: Use memdup_user() rather than duplicating its implementation

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9306999/

Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status
from patchwork:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches