public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli•us>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks•com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch•org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, davem@davemloft•net, jiri@mellanox•com,
	mlxsw@mellanox•com, dsa@cumulusnetworks•com,
	nikolay@cumulusnetworks•com, andy@greyhouse•net,
	vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux•com, andrew@lunn•ch,
	f.fainelli@gmail•com, alexander.h.duyck@intel•com,
	kuznet@ms2•inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei•org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6•org,
	kaber@trash•net, Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox•com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:20:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161102072032.GA1713@nanopsycho.orion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58194BD6.5040406@cumulusnetworks.com>

Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:13:42AM CET, roopa@cumulusnetworks•com wrote:
>On 11/1/16, 10:03 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>> Hi Roopa,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:14:14AM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>>> I have the same concern as Eric here.
>>>
>>> I understand why you need it, but can the driver request for an initial dump and that
>>> dump be made more efficient somehow ie not hold rtnl for the whole dump ?.
>>> instead of making the fib notifier registration code doing it.
>> We can do what we suggested in the last bi-weekly meeting, which is
>> still holding rtnl, but moving the hardware operation to delayed work.
>> This is possible because upper layers always assume operation was
>> successful and driver is responsible for invoking its abort mechanism in
>> case of failure.
>>
>>> these routing table sizes can be huge and an analogy for this in user-space:
>>> We do request a netlink dump of  routing tables at initialization (on driver starts or resets)...
>>> but, existing netlink routing table dumps for that scale don't hold rtnl for the whole dump.
>>> The dump is split into multiple responses to the user and hence it does not starve other rtnl users.
>> In my reply to Eric I mentioned that when we register and unregister
>> from this chain the tables aren't really huge, but instead quite small.
>> I understand your concerns, but I don't wish to make things more
>> complicated than they should be only to address concerns that aren't
>> really realistic.
>
>I understand..but, if you are adding some core infrastructure for switchdev ..it cannot be
>based on the number of simple use-cases or data you have today.
>
>I won't be surprised if tomorrow other switch drivers have a case where they need to
>reset the hw routing table state and reprogram all routes again. Re-registering the notifier to just
>get the routing state of the kernel will not scale. For the long term, since the driver does not maintain a cache,

Driver (mlxsw, rocker) maintain a cache. So I'm not sure why you say
otherwise.


>a pull api with efficient use of rtnl will be useful for other such cases as well.

How do you imagine this "pull API" should look like?


>
>
>If you don't want to get to the complexity of a new api right away because of the
>simple case of management interface routes you have, Can your driver register the notifier early  ?
>(I am sure you have probably already thought about this)

Register early? What it would resolve? I must be missing something. We
register as early as possible. But the thing is, we cannot register
in a past. And that is what this patch resolves.


>
>>
>> I believe current patch is quite simple and also consistent with other
>> notification chains in the kernel, such as the netdevice, where rtnl is
>> held during replay of events.
>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/core/dev.c#L1535
>as you know, netdev and routing scale are not the same thing.
>Looking at the current code for netdevices (replay and rollback on failure),
>a pull api (equivalent to the netlink dump api) may end up being less complex...with an
>ability to batch in the future.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-02  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-31 21:13 [PATCH net-next v2] ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier idosch
2016-10-31 21:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-31 22:57   ` Ido Schimmel
2016-11-01 14:19     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-01 15:14       ` Roopa Prabhu
2016-11-01 15:36         ` David Miller
2016-11-02  7:35           ` Jiri Pirko
2016-11-02 15:26             ` David Miller
2016-11-01 17:03         ` Ido Schimmel
2016-11-02  2:13           ` Roopa Prabhu
2016-11-02  7:20             ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2016-11-02 13:29               ` Roopa Prabhu
2016-11-02 13:44                 ` Ido Schimmel
2016-11-02 13:48                 ` Jiri Pirko
2016-11-02 14:35                   ` Roopa Prabhu
2016-11-02 14:43                     ` Jiri Pirko
2016-11-01 15:44       ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161102072032.GA1713@nanopsycho.orion \
    --to=jiri@resnulli$(echo .)us \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=dsa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch$(echo .)org \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kaber@trash$(echo .)net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2$(echo .)inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=mlxsw@mellanox$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux$(echo .)com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox