public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat•com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp•com>
Cc: "netdev@vger•kernel.org" <netdev@vger•kernel.org>,
	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe•com>,
	brouer@redhat•com, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com>
Subject: Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:16:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116131609.4e5726b4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409757426.26422.41.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>


While optimizing the kernel RX path, I've run into an issue where I
cannot use netperf UDP_STREAM for testing, because the sender is
slower than receiver.  Thus, it cannot show my receiver improvements
(as receiver have idle cycles).

Eric Dumazet previously told me[1] this was related to netperf need to
use connected socket for UDP.  Netperf options "-- -n -N" should
enable connected UDP sockets, but it never worked! Options are
documented, but netperf seems to have a bug.

Called like:
 netperf -H 198.18.50.1 -t UDP_STREAM -l 120 -- -m 1472 -n -N

Problem on sender-side is "__ip_select_ident".

 Samples: 15K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 16409681913
   Overhead  Command         Shared Object     Symbol
 +   11.18%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __ip_select_ident
 +    6.93%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] _raw_spin_lock
 +    6.12%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
 +    4.31%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __ip_make_skb
 +    3.97%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] fib_table_lookup
 +    3.51%  netperf         [mlx5_core]       [k] mlx5e_sq_xmit
 +    2.43%  netperf         [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] __ip_route_output_key_hash
 +    2.24%  netperf         netperf           [.] send_omni_inner
 +    2.17%  netperf         netperf           [.] send_data

[1] Subj: High perf top ip_idents_reserve doing netperf UDP_STREAM
 - https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg294752.html

Not fixed in version 2.7.0.
 - ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/netperf-2.7.0.tar.gz

Used extra netperf configure compile options:
 ./configure  --enable-histogram --enable-demo

It seems like some fix attempts exists in the SVN repository::

 svn checkout http://www.netperf.org/svn/netperf2/trunk/ netperf2-svn
 svn log -r709
 # A quick stab at getting remote connect going for UDP_STREAM
 svn diff -r708:709

Testing with SVN version, still show __ip_select_ident() in top#1.

(p.s. is netperf ever going to be converted from SVN to git?)
-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

(old email below)

On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 08:17:06 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail•com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 16:59 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > When doing:
> >  super_netperf 120 -H 192.168.8.2 -t UDP_STREAM -l 100 -- -m 256
> > 
> > I'm seeing function ip_idents_reserve() consuming most CPU.  Could you
> > help, explain what is going on, and how I can avoid this?
> > 
> > Perf top:
> >   11.67%  [kernel]   [k] ip_idents_reserve
> >    8.37%  [kernel]   [k] fib_table_lookup
> >    4.46%  [kernel]   [k] _raw_spin_lock
> >    3.21%  [kernel]   [k] copy_user_enhanced_fast_string
> >    2.92%  [kernel]   [k] sock_alloc_send_pskb
> >    2.88%  [kernel]   [k] udp_sendmsg
> >   
> 
> Because you use a single destination, all flows compete on a single
> atomic to get their next IP identifier.
> 
> You can try to use netperf options  (-- -N -n) so that netperf uses
> connected UDP sockets.
> 
> In this case, the IP identifier generator is held in each socket.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-03 14:59 High perf top ip_idents_reserve doing netperf UDP_STREAM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2014-09-03 15:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-16 12:16   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2016-11-16 17:46     ` Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets Rick Jones
2016-11-16 22:40       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-16 22:50         ` Rick Jones
2016-11-17  0:34         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17  8:16           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 13:20             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 13:42               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 14:17                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 14:57                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 16:21                     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 18:30                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 18:51                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 21:19                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-17 21:44                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 23:08                               ` Rick Jones
2016-11-18  0:37                                 ` Julian Anastasov
2016-11-18  0:42                                   ` Rick Jones
2016-11-18 17:12                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-21 16:03                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-21 18:10                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-29  6:58                               ` [WIP] net+mlx4: auto doorbell Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 11:38                                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 15:56                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 19:17                                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 19:30                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 22:30                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 22:40                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  0:27                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  1:16                                           ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-01  2:32                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  2:50                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-02 18:16                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01  5:03                                               ` Tom Herbert
2016-12-01 19:24                                                 ` Willem de Bruijn
2016-11-30 13:50                                 ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-30 15:44                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-30 16:27                                     ` Saeed Mahameed
2016-11-30 17:28                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 12:05                                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 14:24                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 16:04                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 17:04                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 19:17                                               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-01 20:11                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 20:20                                               ` David Miller
2016-12-01 22:10                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-02 14:23                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2016-12-01 21:32                                 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-12-01 22:04                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-11-17 17:34                     ` Netperf UDP issue with connected sockets David Laight
2016-11-17 22:39                       ` Alexander Duyck
2016-11-17 17:42             ` Rick Jones
2016-11-28 18:33             ` Rick Jones
2016-11-28 18:40               ` Rick Jones
2016-11-30 10:43               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-11-30 17:42                 ` Rick Jones
2016-11-30 18:11                   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161116131609.4e5726b4@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp$(echo .)com \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hpe$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox