public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat•com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail•com>
Cc: daniel@iogearbox•net, shm@cumulusnetworks•com,
	davem@davemloft•net, tgraf@suug•ch, alexei.starovoitov@gmail•com,
	john.r.fastabend@intel•com, netdev@vger•kernel.org,
	brouer@redhat•com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 4/6] virtio_net: add dedicated XDP transmit queues
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:59:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161208075459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161207201223.28121.87060.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:12:23PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> XDP requires using isolated transmit queues to avoid interference
> with normal networking stack (BQL, NETDEV_TX_BUSY, etc).
> This patch
> adds a XDP queue per cpu when a XDP program is loaded and does not
> expose the queues to the OS via the normal API call to
> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(). This way the stack will never push
> an skb to these queues.
> 
> However virtio/vhost/qemu implementation only allows for creating
> TX/RX queue pairs at this time so creating only TX queues was not
> possible. And because the associated RX queues are being created I
> went ahead and exposed these to the stack and let the backend use
> them. This creates more RX queues visible to the network stack than
> TX queues which is worth mentioning but does not cause any issues as
> far as I can tell.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel•com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index a009299..28b1196 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>  	/* # of queue pairs currently used by the driver */
>  	u16 curr_queue_pairs;
>  
> +	/* # of XDP queue pairs currently used by the driver */
> +	u16 xdp_queue_pairs;
> +
>  	/* I like... big packets and I cannot lie! */
>  	bool big_packets;
>  
> @@ -1547,7 +1550,8 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  	unsigned long int max_sz = PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr);
>  	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> -	int i;
> +	u16 xdp_qp = 0, curr_qp;
> +	int i, err;
>  
>  	if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_LRO) && prog) {
>  		netdev_warn(dev, "can't set XDP while LRO is on, disable LRO first\n");
> @@ -1564,12 +1568,34 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	curr_qp = vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs;
> +	if (prog)
> +		xdp_qp = nr_cpu_ids;
> +
> +	/* XDP requires extra queues for XDP_TX */
> +	if (curr_qp + xdp_qp > vi->max_queue_pairs) {
> +		netdev_warn(dev, "request %i queues but max is %i\n",
> +			    curr_qp + xdp_qp, vi->max_queue_pairs);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}

Can't we disable XDP_TX somehow? Many people might only want RX drop,
and extra queues are not always there.


> +
> +	err = virtnet_set_queues(vi, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_warn(&dev->dev, "XDP Device queue allocation failure.\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (prog) {
>  		prog = bpf_prog_add(prog, vi->max_queue_pairs - 1);
> -		if (IS_ERR(prog))
> +		if (IS_ERR(prog)) {
> +			virtnet_set_queues(vi, curr_qp);
>  			return PTR_ERR(prog);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> +	vi->xdp_queue_pairs = xdp_qp;
> +	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, curr_qp + xdp_qp);
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		old_prog = rtnl_dereference(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog);
>  		rcu_assign_pointer(vi->rq[i].xdp_prog, prog);

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-08  6:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-07 20:10 [net-next PATCH v5 0/6] XDP for virtio_net John Fastabend
2016-12-07 20:11 ` [net-next PATCH v5 1/6] net: virtio dynamically disable/enable LRO John Fastabend
2016-12-08 21:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-09  0:04     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-09  3:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-14 13:31       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-14 17:01         ` John Fastabend
2016-12-15 16:35           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-07 20:11 ` [net-next PATCH v5 2/6] net: xdp: add invalid buffer warning John Fastabend
2016-12-07 20:11 ` [net-next PATCH v5 3/6] virtio_net: Add XDP support John Fastabend
2016-12-08  4:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08  5:14     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-08  5:54       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-07 20:12 ` [net-next PATCH v5 4/6] virtio_net: add dedicated XDP transmit queues John Fastabend
2016-12-08  5:59   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-12-08 17:10     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-07 20:12 ` [net-next PATCH v5 5/6] virtio_net: add XDP_TX support John Fastabend
2016-12-08  6:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 18:18     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-08 21:08       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 21:18       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 21:25         ` John Fastabend
2016-12-08 21:45           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 21:51             ` John Fastabend
2016-12-07 20:13 ` [net-next PATCH v5 6/6] virtio_net: xdp, add slowpath case for non contiguous buffers John Fastabend
2016-12-08 19:17 ` [net-next PATCH v5 0/6] XDP for virtio_net David Miller
2016-12-08 19:38   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-08 20:46     ` John Fastabend
2016-12-08 20:58       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 21:10         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-08 21:08       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-08 22:16       ` David Miller
2016-12-09  3:01         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-12-13  8:46     ` XDP_DROP and XDP_TX (Was: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 0/6] XDP for virtio_net) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2016-12-08 21:16   ` [net-next PATCH v5 0/6] XDP for virtio_net Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161208075459-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=brouer@redhat$(echo .)com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox$(echo .)net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft$(echo .)net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel$(echo .)com \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=shm@cumulusnetworks$(echo .)com \
    --cc=tgraf@suug$(echo .)ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox