Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] uapi: fix signess in ethtool_validate_speed()

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:36:44 +0200

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:20:53PM +0100, Volodymyr Bendiuga wrote:
> From: Jonas Johansson <[email-masked]>
> 
> There is a comparison of speed  variable which
> is unsigned, and SPEED_UNKNOWN which is signed.

So?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Johansson <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Bendiuga <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> index f0db778..1ca4a77 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h
> @@ -1500,7 +1500,7 @@ enum ethtool_link_mode_bit_indices {
>  
>  #define SPEED_UNKNOWN		-1
>  
> -static inline int ethtool_validate_speed(__u32 speed)
> +static inline int ethtool_validate_speed(__s32 speed)
>  {
>  	return speed <= INT_MAX || speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN;
>  }

Then comparison to INT_MAX does not make sense.

> -- 
> 2.7.4